Comments on: Bush Rides Again:Birth Control Defined as "Abortion"?

By: paradigmslavechainz

paradigmslavechainz — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:15:00 +0000

not really sure what you meant about *set something in here* in your comment to me,smiles. I will read this when i have more time,although i’m more interested in the D/s aspect of life,grinz-ty for your comment on my site,i will be writing more!

By: FaeLina

FaeLina — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:57:00 +0000

THIS IS BULLSHIT! I take birthcontrol not for the no pregnancy(though that is a nice side effect, being only 24) but to regulate my periods. And as person against abortion(I’m pro choice for abortion, but strongly recommend people against it), being a Christian. So this would just classify me as a hypocrit. So what are we supposed to do when he makes it go against our personal beliefs and religion. Just deal with the two weeks of bleeding and debilitating cramps? FUCK NO! I’ll move out of the country before I let that prick and his bitch ass administration tell me that I have to deal with that every month.

This violates personal rights, seperation of church and state, and is, as stated by the Lizard Queen, sexist. If they want to be pigs and put all of the conception on women, then men need to get vasectamies so they can’t produce sperm. Then it’s all the women’s faults. I don’t know of anyone who would support this BS. Not even my most devout catholic friends…..

By: single gal

single gal — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:36:00 +0000

That’s fucking frightening.
Especially with our current political ‘leadership’, Mr. “Bend-over-to-Bush” Harper.

But think about this: Those that take birth control to help relieve cramps, acne, etc. They’re apparently participating in abortion.

Fuck, great entry! Good wake-up call.

By: C.J. Strata

C.J. Strata — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:24:00 +0000

It’s all part of the malicious Catholic plan to stamp out all forms of recreational sex, and eventually cleanse humanity of “original sin” completely! Soon condoms will be banned, and then pulling out will be illegal, too! With no way to avoid conception, people shall have to submit to the Church’s rules and never ever have sex ever again ever! Only then shall we truly be pure in God’s eyes! For the few decades before humanity is wiped out due to not procreating, anyway.

In seriousness, this is absolutely preposterous. Not to mention it’s coming from the administration which isn’t doing a damn thing to improve foster care, child services, or anything else related to those children they’re forcing people to have. “Don’t expect me to take care of the bastard!” as my uncle would (and did) say.

By: Cynthia Dalton

Cynthia Dalton — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:04:00 +0000

This is ridiculous! Just so his insurance company buddies can avoid paying for contraceptive services for women based on a “moral” arguement.Meanwhile they pay for the “medically necessary” Viagra and analogues in full without blinking an eye. If this succeeds it will in effect overturn state laws requiring that insurance pay for birth control.

Not to mention setting up women and physicians for criminal chrges in states where abortions are illegal.

By: The Lizard Queen

The Lizard Queen — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:30:00 +0000

As I read this, the feminist inside me rages because their attempt at redefinition is only aimed at the female actions of reproduction prevention. The Pill has relatively the same efficacy rate as properly used condoms, so why are prophylactics excluded? I would love to hear supporting politicians explain that one

Perhaps it’s just me, but I think they need to focus their efforts on legislation that is not entirely assinine and flying in the face of basic rights to freedom.